-
cat diary. some great lines! --nb
-
Activists Take to the Streets to Protest Genetically Modified Foods
By Michele Henry, Toronto Star
They’re angry. They’re scared. And they want to know exactly what…
and boycott products with gmos. —nb
(via jo-discontent)
Posted on May 22, 2013 via Earth First! Journal with 6 notes
Source: earthfirstjournal
-

always they pester poor bill. —nb
-
Scientists find woman who sees 99 million more colors than others Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/326976#ixzz2U4gCydlC
cool! —nb
——
By JohnThomas DidymusJun 19, 2012Newcastle University neuroscientist Dr. Gabriele Jordan, recently announced that she has identified a woman who is a “tetrachromat,” that is, a woman with the ability to see much greater color depth than the ordinary person.According to Daily Mail, an ordinary person can perceive a million different hues of colors. The power to distinguish the hues comes from cells in our eyes called cones. In the average person, there are three types of cones each of which is triggered by different wavelengths of light. Discover Magazine explains that most people have three types of cones, and are said to be “trichromats.” Color blind individuals have only two types of cones and they are said to be “dichromats.” Almost all animals, including dogs and New World Monkeys are dichromats. However, scientists have long believed that there are people with four cones who can see a wider range of colors than most of us can detect. These persons are called “tetrachromats,” and can see a hundred million colors. From the perspective of such people, the hues familiar to trichromats fracture further into more subtle shades of differences that have not been given names since most of us are trichromats who cannot see these shades and name them. Jordan and her colleagues have for 20 years searched for people endowed with super color vision, or tetrachromatic vision. According to Discover Magazine, Jordan found a tetrachromat two year ago. Although the person is the first tetrachromat known to science, the researchers believe there are others. Discover Magazine reports that Jordan and her team found many people with four types of cones but only one person passed the tests for tetrachromatic vision. The woman, identified as subject cDa29, is a doctor living in northern England. Jordan and her colleagues believe there may be other persons with tetrachromatic vision. Jordan told Discover Magazine that she was very excited by her discovery. It took 20 years to search for her to identify the first true tetrachromat. But a question immediately arose: Why is it that there are people with four cones who apparently do not exhibit tetrachromatic vision? Jordan said: “We now know tetrachromacy exists. But we don’t know what allows someone to become functionally tetrachromatic, when most four-coned women aren’t.” Historical background The first evidence that tetrachromats might exist came in 1948, Discover Magazine reports. A paper on color blindness written by the Dutch scientist HL de Vries, investigated color blind men who possess two normal cones and a mutant cone that is less sensitive to either green or red. This makes it difficult for such people to distinguish the two colors. De Vries incidentally tested the daughters of one of the color blind men and found that they could detect a wider range of hues of red than average persons. He found that while the color blind men had two normal cones and one mutant cone, the mothers and daughters of the color blind men had a mutant cone and three normal cones, that is, a total of four cones. He believed that the extra cone explained whey the women seemed able to distinguish a wider variety of hues of red. But De Vries did not have the opportunity to investigate the phenomenon further. John Mollon of Cambridge University became interested in tetrachromacy in the 1980s. Jordan who was working with Mollon, concluded that since color blindness or dichromacy is common, then tetrachromacy should also be common. She estimated that about 12 percent of women are tetrachromats. The researchers selected for their study mothers of color blind men who had three normal cones and one mutant cone, and tested them for the variety of hues they could detect. But the women showed no signs of ability to detect a greater variety of colors than ordinary persons. This led to the conclusion that the fourth mutant cone was inactive in these women. According to Discover Magazine, in 2007, Jordan, now at Newcastle, developed more powerful methods for identifying women with tetrachromatic vision. She chose 25 women all of whom had a fourth cone and tested them for tetrachromatic vision. She identified one woman tagged cDa29, who got all questions designed to detect an extended range of color vision correct. Jordan told Discover Magazine: “I was jumping up and down.” After 20 years of search she had finally found a true tetrachomat. Discover Magazine reports that Jay Neitz, vision researcher at the University of Washington, believes that all women with four cones have potential for tetrachromatic vision but most need to develop or awaken the ability. Neitz said: “Most of the things that we see as colored are manufactured by people who are trying to make colors that work for trichromats. It could be that our whole world is tuned to the world of the trichromat.” Neittz also suggested that the natural environment may not have sufficient hues of colors to harness the full potentials of tetrachromatic vision. He said that people with four cones may be helped to develop full tetrachromatic vision if they regularly visit a lab where they are exposed to vision experiences that will help then develop the cognitive skills to identify a richer variety of hues. An intriguing question that arose was: How does cDa29 see the world? She was unable to communicate her experience to the researchers in much the same way as it is impossible to describe the experience of red to a dichromatic person. Jordan says: “This private perception is what everybody is curious about. I would love to see that.”
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/326976#ixzz2U4gbhsjePosted on May 22, 2013 with 1 note
Source: digitaljournal.com
-
LEDs in greenhouses deliver same yield as grow lights, using just 25% of the energy: “LED lights may soon enable greenhouse growers to grow affordable, vine-ripened tomatoes and other produce items much closer to the market, enabling more local food production, especially in the northern latitudes.”
need to experiment with this and houseplants… —nb
(via qbits)
Posted on May 22, 2013 via TreeHugger with 50 notes
Source: treehugger
-
diversity in everything is being decimated by the corporate drive towards monopolization. this includes monocultural agriculture and monsanto’s drive to reduce the world’s seed supply to a handful that they own and have patent rights over. —-nb
Posted on May 21, 2013 with 3 notes
Source: thehealthyhomeeconomist.com
-

SHARE TO SAVE TUMBLR!
- Let’s try and get 100k notes
A review by one of the folks sums it up perfectly:
“What worries me about Yahoo! buying Tumblr is how it would choose to incorporate the website into its email and homepage features. One of the reasons why Tumblr is so unique is because it’s a niche market. By adding more users who don’t fit into this niche, it would make it more difficult for communities to develop within Tumblr, and Tumblr would have to change to accommodate these new users. Tumblr as a website is not the kind that you can sign up for in a day and be on your way. It is a website crafted so that you can immediately post but must spend several weeks, sometimes even months, to build a community. With new users who would not be willing to spend time growing a community, Tumblr would have to be changed, which would alienate its current users. Those users have spent time and effort to make Tumblr what it is today, and they are the ones who spend time on the website daily. A user who is checking onto Tumblr because it’s attached to their homepage is not going to be as strong of a user nor as dedicated. By changing the website to suit this new user, you would lose the strong users while building an undedicated usership.
To any website that would think of buying Tumblr, they must understand that it is a website that cannot be changed to make it more user friendly to a casual blogger. I think that many Tumblr users would be less worried about a buy-out if they were promised that their communities and ways of using Tumblr would not be changed. No one is going to mind Yahoo! buying the website and gaining a few extra million dollars per year from the minimal advertising; what we will be upset with is if a company like Yahoo! then changes the website to increase casual users and decrease dedicated users. Yahoo! would gain nothing by losing this “cool” group of bloggers in an age group they so desperately want to reach, so they must cater to these individuals by leaving the website exactly as is.” - houseoftombombadil
As much as is does sound like a load of bullshit for someone to buy Tumblr, it’s a possibility. I Personally think it should stay independent and I hope David Karp keeps a hold of it like his own child. Or we make enough noise to where such major changes (if bought) will not happen. I would hate to see Tumblr turned into an advertising dump.We’re not a ‘hip fad group’ to be marketed to. I hate the fact that’s all we look like to businesses in the end.reblogging again for this ^
I’m enjoying all the discussions going on about the potential sale. Learning lots too.
yahoo will turn tumblr into a marketing tool by attracting the willfully ignorant and pumping up the ads to that target group. it will be neutered and dumbed down following the corporate agenda to stifle, marginalize, and privatize critical and creative thinking. —nb
Posted on May 20, 2013 via My Teen Quote with 118,623 notes
Source: my--teen--quote
-

smokey, eco-terrorist! :) —nb
-
Canada Approves Dow’s new Enlist Duo Herbicide | REALfarmacy.com | Healthy News and Information
meanwhile, the evil empire is still pushing poison. great solution to roundup-ready resistant weeds… more of the same, but stronger! more big bucks for Big Chem. canada remains their experimental lab… —nb
-
French President Signs Gay Marriage Into Law
bravo! encore un pays qui montre son intelligence. netherlands, belgium, spain, canada, south africa, norway, sweden, portugal, iceland, argentina, new zealand, denmark, uruguay… keep that ball rolling! —nb
—-
PARIS — French President Francois Hollande has signed a law authorizing gay marriage and adoption by same-sex couples, after months of nationwide protests and wrenching debate.
His signature means the first gay marriages may be celebrated in France within about 10 days. Hollande’s office said he signed the bill Saturday morning, a day after the Constitutional Council struck down a challenge to the law.
Hollande, a Socialist, had made legalizing gay marriage one of his campaign pledges last year. While polls for years have shown majority support for gay marriage in France, adoption by same-sex couples is more controversial. The bill prompted months of widespread protests, largely by conservative and religious groups. Some were marred by clashes with police. It became a flashpoint for frustrations at the increasingly unpopular Hollande.


